How shall not the ministration of the spirit be rather glorious? Paul completes his qal wahomer (light-to-heavy) argument: if the ministry of death had glory, then the ministration of the spirit (Greek hē diakonia tou pneumatos, ἡ διακονία τοῦ πνεύματος) must be rather glorious (Greek mallon estai en doxē, μᾶλλον ἔσται ἐν δόξῃ, "be more in glory"). The contrast is between death (thanatos, θάνατος) in verse 7 and Spirit (pneuma, πνεῦμα) here—between what kills and what gives life.
The rhetorical question expects an obvious "yes" answer. The logic is irrefutable: the lesser (law-giving) possessed glory; therefore the greater (Spirit-giving) must possess surpassing glory. Paul's use of the future tense estai (ἔσται, "shall be") may suggest the full manifestation of new covenant glory awaits consummation, though it is already present in the Spirit's work. The new covenant is not merely slightly better than the old—it is categorically superior in every way.
Historical Context
Paul writes to a church influenced by Judaizers who insisted Gentile converts must observe Mosaic law (circumcision, dietary restrictions, Sabbath). These teachers likely argued from the glory of Sinai to support their position. Paul turns the argument on its head: yes, Sinai was glorious, but that very glory was designed to fade, pointing forward to something greater. The new covenant ministry, empowered by the indwelling Spirit rather than external law, surpasses the old as substance exceeds shadow. This was revolutionary theology that redefined Israel's story around Christ.
Questions for Reflection
Do you experience the Christian life as "glorious," or does it feel like drudgery and duty? What might Paul's words reveal about the difference?
How does the "ministration of the Spirit" in your life demonstrate surpassing glory compared to mere rule-keeping?
In what ways can you more fully embrace and display the glory of the new covenant to those still living under the bondage of law?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
How shall not the ministration of the spirit be rather glorious? Paul completes his qal wahomer (light-to-heavy) argument: if the ministry of death had glory, then the ministration of the spirit (Greek hē diakonia tou pneumatos, ἡ διακονία τοῦ πνεύματος) must be rather glorious (Greek mallon estai en doxē, μᾶλλον ἔσται ἐν δόξῃ, "be more in glory"). The contrast is between death (thanatos, θάνατος) in verse 7 and Spirit (pneuma, πνεῦμα) here—between what kills and what gives life.
The rhetorical question expects an obvious "yes" answer. The logic is irrefutable: the lesser (law-giving) possessed glory; therefore the greater (Spirit-giving) must possess surpassing glory. Paul's use of the future tense estai (ἔσται, "shall be") may suggest the full manifestation of new covenant glory awaits consummation, though it is already present in the Spirit's work. The new covenant is not merely slightly better than the old—it is categorically superior in every way.